Inyonim.com Under Fire: Is the Founder Running the Site Solo Under Multiple Accounts?
The implications are serious. If a single individual controls several of these accounts, they effectively have the power to decide which articles see the light of day—and which ones never make it past moderation. This is a tool for silencing criticism.
A closer look at Inyonim.com reveals troubling signs that the platform may be far from the democratic forum it claims to be. Evidence suggests that the founder may be running multiple “vaad” accounts—high-level accounts that require 200 points to access, a threshold that is currently unreachable for ordinary users.
Multiple Accounts, One Voice
The implications are serious. “Vaad” accounts control what content gets posted and approved. If a single individual controls several of these accounts, they effectively have the power to decide which articles and posts see the light of day—and which ones never make it past moderation. This is not just a flaw in the system; it’s a potential tool for silencing criticism.
Suppressing Criticism, Protecting Power
With this level of control, the founder could remove or block any post that questions his actions or policies, while favoring content that reinforces his own perspective. The very structure of the site gives him the ultimate veto power, disguised as community governance.
Transparency—or the Lack Thereof
The only way to prove that the site isn’t entirely biased is for the founder to allow this article—and any other criticism—to be published. If it appears, it would be the strongest evidence that the platform is not just a personal echo chamber. But so far, the pattern of “vaad” accounts raises more questions than answers.
Conclusion: A Platform in Crisis
Inyonim.com risks losing credibility if this lack of transparency continues. A platform that allows one person to hold multiple “seats” in its decision-making process cannot claim to be a fair or open forum. Until the founder demonstrates accountability, users are left to wonder: is Inyonim.com a community, or a personal megaphone?
But then, you look at the URL bar.
You realize you are reading this exact article—an expose detailing the corruption and censorship of the platform—right here, front and center, on Inyonim.com.
Which means one of two things happened. Either the “tyrannical founder” fell asleep at the wheel, or he looked at a scathing takedown of his own project, shrugged, and hit the green Approve button anyway.
Suddenly, the narrative of a silenced community gets a little complicated. If the "Vaad" was truly a puppet regime designed to crush dissent, this post would be in the digital trash can. Instead, it’s trending. It turns out that the multiple "Vaad" accounts might not be a conspiracy to hoard power, but simply empty seats at a table waiting for actual users to show up and claim them.
So, the founder isn't silencing the room; he’s just the only one currently shouting into the microphone to make sure it works. And considering he just handed the mic to his biggest critic—this article—it seems the platform might be a lot more open than the conspiracy theories suggest.